Scandal of Guantánamo Bay prisoners still held despite being cleared for release, and timing of Boston terror

The timing could hardly have been worse: The Boston bombings occurred the day after an Independent on Sunday exposé of “President Obama’s shame” in not releasing 86 prisoners at Guantánamo Bay cleared for release (that itself was the day after most prisoners clashed with guards) which has led to a mass hunger strike – never mind the plight of others stuck there deemed “too dangerous to release”. It is too early to jump to conclusions about the instigator(s) of the Boston atrocities but Chechens are being blamed in some of the US media. As the IoS article says:

“Today, 166 inmates remain. Three have been convicted, while a further 30 will face trial. Fifty or so are in a legal no-man’s-land, deemed by the authorities too dangerous to release but against whom there is not enough evidence to prosecute. And then there are 86 who have been cleared for release, but who instead rot in a hell from which there is no escape. No wonder yesterday more than 160 of them were involved in clashes with guards that led to what the US said were “less than lethal” rounds being fired.”

Many of the detainees are from Yemen, and the excuse for not releasing them was a foiled Yemeni plot to smuggle a bomb on-board an airliner in May 2012. But not releasing them just because they came from that country is obviously racism.

According to this report on the Close Guantánamo website, 40 of those prisoners were cleared for release by President Obama’s interagency Guantánamo Review Task Force at least 5 years ago.

Anybody concerned about human rights should be appalled by the injustices (including the torture of course) of Guantánamo Bay, which is the biggest source of recruitment for al-Qaeda, just as the Diplock courts (without juries) and treatment of hunger strikers like Bobby Sands MP in Northern Ireland (allowed to die by Thatcher) aided recruitment to the IRA.

3 thoughts on “Scandal of Guantánamo Bay prisoners still held despite being cleared for release, and timing of Boston terror

    • My view is that Obama made that pledge to close Guantanamo due to the masses of ordinary people at his inauguration, but now that he has surrounded himself with overwhelmingly right-wing white middle-aged men, he has naturally been influenced by them and betrayed the masses.

  1. Obama, like most politicians, is a front man for the 1% and said whatever it took to get elected. The fact that he’s reneged on his promises regarding Guantanamo should be no surprise as he’s not actually in charge and can only follow the orders he receives from behind the scenes. The puppet masters clearly don’t want to release these people, he takes the flack, comes out with some spin, we’re all enthralled and distracted from what should be our main purpose: getting rid of the system and replacing it with something truly democratic such as direct democracy via the Internet where everyone can debate policy and everyone gets to vote on everything (Vote For Yourself as I call it). A route in:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s